NY Times article from 12/22
OK, so the NY Times ran a truly loathsome article on meds (here's the link, but after seven days you have to pay, I think, unless you're a subscriber... http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/22/health/22KIDS.html?_r=1&oref=slogin) . I was really angry about this--blood boiling, red in the face, angry. I knew immediately upon reading it that I wanted to respond, but took a couple days to calm down before sending my email.
Now, I have to say that while I don't regularly write letter to the editor or that sort of thing, this is the second time I have written to a NY Times writer.
The first time was when they wrote an article on "sugar" in soft drinks being linked to obesity. Of course, soft drinks don't have any sugar...they are made with high fructose corn syrup. I pointed this out to the author, but my email didn't get a response. I don't expect that this one will, either.
That said, I'm going to stop reading the NY Times. They clearly don't do any fact checking.
So, this is the letter I wrote to the author of the article, Benedict Carey:
Dear Benedict:
If you have received a lot of vitriolic responses to your article on ADHD already, please accept my apologies for piling on.
Firstly, I'm curious why you chose to label ADD/ADHD as a "Mental Disorder", when it is broadly considered to be a disorder with a neurological basis.
Quite honestly, as the wife of a man with ADHD and the mother of a child with the disorder, I found your article to be incredibly biased, and something the sanctimoniously judging masses can cite as "proof" that our parenting is inadequate and lax...that we are lazy, and our children would be fine if only we would put forth a bit more effort.
The family that is the basis of this entire article has a somewhat unusual situation. If symptoms present primarily at home, I would personally find the diagnosis of ADHD to be is suspicious. A child who has atypical neurological functioning that truly is ADHD, as opposed to a child who simply has behaviors consistent with ADHD, will have problems in every setting. Home is likely to be where the problems are the least troublesome for such a child, as the expectations are less stringent at home than at school (for example), and there is less external stimilu.
Additionally, medicating your child with stimulant meds is hardly easy or desirable for the families involved. We all hate it. We fight with insurance companies, doctors offices and pharmacies constantly. The schools are against us in a lot of cases. Our children have trouble at camp, on playdates, at the playground, on the subway.
Really, it would have been nice if you had presented the other side of the coin in your article rather than just indicating that we aren't doing enough work from a behavioral standpoint.
The meds aren't perfect, but I believe and hope that in the near future, the research being done on Autism will provide relief for the children with other neurological disorders such as ADHD and Tourrette's syndrome as well.
Sincerely,
Moi
So, that was my little rant. Angry, angry, angry mamma.
On a lighter note, Squirrel is having a great time in VT with my parents. They aren't giving him meds while he is there, and he is eating everything in sight, which is a good thing. He's such a skinny bean.
When he gets back, he is taking the OLSAT for (maybe) getting into a gifted and talented program. Frankly, I'm considering bagging the whole mainstream ideas and getting him into a special needs private school. I'm tired of teachers and administrators who don't understand what is happening, and feel like the peace of mind I would get and the self-esteem boost he would get from not being "weird" would be such a bonus that it would make up for the loss of his second language.
Not that he would "lose" it...we would support it. But, it isn't quite the same.
Happy new year, all.
